From sysadmin at omsoft.com Mon Apr 8 18:11:04 2019 From: sysadmin at omsoft.com (Omsoft Systems Administration) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:11:04 -0700 Subject: [Davisgig] Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! Message-ID: Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease.? Those who have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable franchise expired. They seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a publicly owned fiber network.? We need our community in the driver seat when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust competition and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned company taking advantage of our City. A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a handful of cranky geeks.? Toward that end, we want to muster as many people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern as they enter the building. Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. Thanks, and I hope to see you there! From flcli at UCDAVIS.EDU Mon Apr 8 19:40:01 2019 From: flcli at UCDAVIS.EDU (Fei Li) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 02:40:01 +0000 Subject: [Davisgig] [Davisgig-announce] Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! In-Reply-To: <06aa929f-f99d-b164-56db-ef8d96ff8451@omsoft.com> References: <06aa929f-f99d-b164-56db-ef8d96ff8451@omsoft.com> Message-ID: <09D289FD-389F-4E7D-8353-D2780B8E45F2@UCDAVIS.EDU> I?ll be there. > On Apr 8, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Omsoft Systems Administration via Davisgig-announce wrote: > > Hello Davisites > > We deeply appreciated those who came to the 3/27 Broadband Task Force Meeting, the community spoke with a unified voice to the Task Force and City Council Member Dan Carson! You wanted community ownership and open access, you want a network that will be a foundation for economic development for the years ahead, you are heroes! > > But Big Money is barreling ahead. > > Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease. Those who have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable franchise expired. > > City Management seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a publicly owned fiber network. We need our community in the driver seat when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust competition, and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned company taking advantage of our City. > > > A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a handful of cranky geeks. Toward that end, we want to muster as many people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern as they enter the building. > > Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. > > If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. > > Thanks, and I hope to see you there! > > > _______________________________________________ > Davisgig-announce mailing list > Davisgig-announce at list.davisgig.org > %To unsubscribe(web_page_url)slistinfo/davisgig-announce From mattwill at pacbell.net Tue Apr 9 00:26:56 2019 From: mattwill at pacbell.net (Matthews Williams) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Davisgig] Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1577546867.314273.1554794816987@mail.yahoo.com> DavisGIG members, let me add my strong voice of support to what Rob has said here.? Please come at 5:15 and bring as many friends as you can muster.? The recent Council deliberations on downtown parking had between 50 and 100 people in attendance.? That kind of turnout made a difference.? The Council could not ignore it.? We have the same opportunity tomorrow.? Having 100 people there at 5:15 will be almost impossible for the Council members to ignore.? So muster up as many friends as you can and make a statement in support of community broadband. Thank you. Matt Williams On Monday, April 8, 2019, 6:12:07 PM PDT, Omsoft Systems Administration wrote: Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease.? Those who have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable franchise expired. They seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a publicly owned fiber network.? We need our community in the driver seat when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust competition and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned company taking advantage of our City. A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a handful of cranky geeks.? Toward that end, we want to muster as many people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern as they enter the building. Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. Thanks, and I hope to see you there! _______________________________________________ Please ref our wiki for details, documents and contacts: http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~help/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=start Davisgig mailing list Davisgig at list.omsoft.com http://list.omsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/davisgig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmischki at dcn.davis.ca.us Tue Apr 9 15:50:12 2019 From: jmischki at dcn.davis.ca.us (Jeff Mischkinsky) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:50:12 -0700 Subject: [Davisgig] Important -- City Council Meeting Today!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I?ll be there around 5, today - tuesday 09 April 2019. As Matt points out, i think the important bit is to have as large a public presence as we can muster on short notice. Its not really necessary to tie up the meeting time (and annoy council members) with lots of repetitive public comment. One, with a big ?hear, hear, I agree? will get the message across. City Council members obviously will know why we are there, and can count. :-) see you later, jeff > On Apr 09, 2019, at 12:00, davisgig-request at list.omsoft.com wrote: > > > 1. Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! > (Omsoft Systems Administration) > 2. Re: [Davisgig-announce] Important -- City Council Meeting > Tomorrow! (Fei Li) > 3. Re: Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! > (Matthews Williams) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:11:04 -0700 > From: Omsoft Systems Administration > To: Davis gig > Subject: [Davisgig] Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > > > Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with > Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease.? Those who > have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a > proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting > out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit > its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable > franchise expired. > > They seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a > recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, > advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are > proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a > publicly owned fiber network.? We need our community in the driver seat > when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust > competition and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our > community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned > company taking advantage of our City. > > A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options > for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the > Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a > handful of cranky geeks.? Toward that end, we want to muster as many > people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell > Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council > members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern > as they enter the building. > > Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. > Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around > for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. > A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. > > If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an > email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. > > Thanks, and I hope to see you there! > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 02:40:01 +0000 > From: Fei Li > To: "davisgig at list.omsoft.com" , > "help at dcn.org" > Cc: "davisgig-announce at list.davisgig.org" > , Omsoft Systems Administration > > Subject: Re: [Davisgig] [Davisgig-announce] Important -- City Council > Meeting Tomorrow! > Message-ID: <09D289FD-389F-4E7D-8353-D2780B8E45F2 at UCDAVIS.EDU> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I?ll be there. > >> On Apr 8, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Omsoft Systems Administration via Davisgig-announce wrote: >> >> Hello Davisites >> >> We deeply appreciated those who came to the 3/27 Broadband Task Force Meeting, the community spoke with a unified voice to the Task Force and City Council Member Dan Carson! You wanted community ownership and open access, you want a network that will be a foundation for economic development for the years ahead, you are heroes! >> >> But Big Money is barreling ahead. >> >> Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease. Those who have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable franchise expired. >> >> City Management seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a publicly owned fiber network. We need our community in the driver seat when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust competition, and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned company taking advantage of our City. >> >> >> A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a handful of cranky geeks. Toward that end, we want to muster as many people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern as they enter the building. >> >> Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. >> >> If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. >> >> Thanks, and I hope to see you there! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Davisgig-announce mailing list >> Davisgig-announce at list.davisgig.org >> %To unsubscribe(web_page_url)slistinfo/davisgig-announce > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:26:56 +0000 (UTC) > From: Matthews Williams > To: Davis gig , "help at dcn.org" > > Subject: Re: [Davisgig] Important -- City Council Meeting Tomorrow! > Message-ID: <1577546867.314273.1554794816987 at mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > DavisGIG members, let me add my strong voice of support to what Rob has said here.? Please come at 5:15 and bring as many friends as you can muster.? The recent Council deliberations on downtown parking had between 50 and 100 people in attendance.? That kind of turnout made a difference.? The Council could not ignore it.? We have the same opportunity tomorrow.? Having 100 people there at 5:15 will be almost impossible for the Council members to ignore.? So muster up as many friends as you can and make a statement in support of community broadband. > Thank you. > > Matt Williams > > > On Monday, April 8, 2019, 6:12:07 PM PDT, Omsoft Systems Administration wrote: > Tomorrow (Tuesday 4/9) the City Council will meet in closed session with > Astound Wave to negotiate the terms of a city conduit lease.? Those who > have been following this effort know that the city has not yet done a > proper analysis of the value of their installed conduit, and is acting > out of a perceived need to rush a deal to completion in order to limit > its Internet access costs, which skyrocketed when the Comcast cable > franchise expired. > > They seem to be proceeding with this negotiation in spite of a > recommendation passed UNANIMOUSLY by the Broadband Advisory Task Force, > advising they do a fiscal analysis of the value of the conduit they are > proposing to lease, nor examining the impact this would have to a > publicly owned fiber network.? We need our community in the driver seat > when it comes to the future of telecommunications in Davis, with robust > competition and revenue from fiber lease fees returning into our > community. We do not accept another monopoly level Private Equity owned > company taking advantage of our City. > > A badly-negotiated lease agreement will permanently foreclose options > for a public-oriented fiber network, and we need to make sure the > Council knows that those objecting to the current process aren't just a > handful of cranky geeks.? Toward that end, we want to muster as many > people as possible in the Council Chambers lobby (at City Hall, Russell > Boulevard at A Street) shortly before the meeting so that the Council > members and the City Manager can appreciate the level of public concern > as they enter the building. > > Please consider making it to the Council Chambers at 5:15 tomorrow. > Since the item will be in closed session, there's no need to hang around > for the meeting unless you're motivated to speak during public comment. > A show of force before the meeting is what's most urgently needed. > > If you're able to make it, it would be helpful if you would drop an > email to help at dcn.org so that we have some idea of expected headcount. > > Thanks, and I hope to see you there! > > _______________________________________________ > > Please ref our wiki for details, documents and contacts: > > http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~help/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=start > > Davisgig mailing list > Davisgig at list.omsoft.com > http://list.omsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/davisgig > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > > The Davis Gig Wiki > > http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~help/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=start > > Davisgig mailing list > Davisgig at list.omsoft.com > http://list.omsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/davisgig > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Davisgig Digest, Vol 50, Issue 1 > *************************************** --- Jeff Mischkinsky jmischki at dcn.davis.ca.us +1 530-758-9850 From rob at omsoft.com Wed Apr 10 17:01:01 2019 From: rob at omsoft.com (Robert Nickerson) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:01:01 -0700 Subject: [Davisgig] Fwd: Dark Fiber: Monetizing an Essential Asset in a Broadband World Webinar - Register Now! In-Reply-To: <1132467480534.1116651795207.1481716072.0.461450JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> References: <1132467480534.1116651795207.1481716072.0.461450JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> Message-ID: <5fd802cc-e374-6345-0650-5207d4d539e2@omsoft.com> Hi If anyone is interested, especially people on the Task Force ;) RAN -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Dark Fiber: Monetizing an Essential Asset in a Broadband World Webinar - Register Now! Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:51:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Keller and Heckman LLP's Telecommunications Practice Reply-To: announcements at khlaw.com To: rob at omsoft.com Join Keller and Heckman Telecommunications partners Doug Jarrett and Tom Magee for a complimentary webinar prepared for operators of fiber networks looking to generate revenue from available network capacity through dark fiber leases and indefeasible rights of use (IRUs). ** The growing demand for fiber-based network capacity is being driven by bandwidth-intensive Internet applications, cloud computing, enterprise and government communications, and 5G wireless networks. While the largest service providers maintain substantial fiber networks, these and other service providers look to other fiber network operators to extend, add redundancy, or increase capacity of their systems. Our presentation will provide an in-depth review of the major deal points, service provider/enterprise expectations, essential business terms, and risk allocation provisions in dark fiber leases and IRU agreements. At the end of the presentation, the presenters will have an open question and answer session for the attendees, time permitting. * Webinar Details * *Date:* Thursday, May 9, 2019 *Time: *1:00 PM - 1:45 PM ET *Cost:* Complimentary *Registration: * Click here to register. *Doug Jarrett * *Tom Magee * OPT-OUT: Keller and Heckman LLP provides announcements as an information tool to businesses. If you prefer not to receive announcements, please use the SafeUnsubscribe link in the footer below. OPT-IN: If this was sent to you by a third party and you would like to be included on our mailing list, click here . Then complete the brief form and select which topics are of interest to you. If you have already requested to opt out from this announcement and you continue to receive messages, please be sure to send an email to optout at khlaw.com and include all email addresses that may be associated with your email account or any predecessor's email address that may be getting forwarded to your current email address. We make every effort to remove email addresses once we receive the opt out request, and we apologize for any inconvenience this has caused. Copyright ? 2019. All Rights Reserved. Keller and Heckman,1001?G?Street?NW,Suite?500?West,?Washington,?DC?20001 SafeUnsubscribe? rob at omsoft.com Forward this email | Update Profile ?| About our service provider Sent by announcements at khlaw.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From omrob at omsoft.com Fri Apr 12 10:14:13 2019 From: omrob at omsoft.com (Robert Nickerson) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:14:13 -0700 Subject: [Davisgig] Fwd: Notes from My Meeting with Mike Webb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Folks One of the people trying to make this happen met with the City Manager yesterday, and here is a summation of the meeting.? Looks like we have a PAUSE to the Astound Contract which is great. The next 6 weeks are CRITICAL to the success of this project. At the next BATF meeting we will? have to present a more fully developed plan, we hope the BATF adopts the plan to recommend to City Council. We are working out a draft of that we will share with you all in the next week for feedback and comment.? We should be able to pull a list of talking points from this document we can use to talk with City council, and community members. We have to turn up a lot of support at whatever City Council meeting the BATF recommendations will be presented at in May. Thank you all for coming, and I believe you all, and the other citizens that came Tuesday and piled together at the Item helped make the difference here to slow them down. Here are the notes ... As scheduled, I met with Mike today. Below are some notes pertaining to our discussion: 1. I opened by making it clear that I wasn't formally representing any organization, but noted that my affiliations with both DCN and DavisGig prompted my interest in the Wave matter. 2. I emphasized the need for the city to allow the BATF process to conclude before committing unique city resources to a long-term agreement. Mike said that the city is now on board with that idea, and that the general sense of CC and staff is that hitting the pause button on the Wave agreement is appropriate. He acknowledged that the original staff proposal was a response to similar agreements entered into by both the City of Woodland and Yolo County. (I wasn't able to find anything on a Woodland agreement with Wave, but did find that the County approved an IRU agreement with Wave on 1/29/19. I only skimmed that agreement, but it appears to be essentially the same as the one that landed on the Davis consent calendar. I have a copy if anyone wants to see it and doesn't want to wade through the county website.) 3. Mike understands that the city needs to more thoroughly analyze the costs and benefits of a deal with Wave. He said that the city might have to go a year or two paying retail, but noted that $150k a year isn't that much in the city's budget context. On the other hand, he said that past efforts to interest Crown Castle and others in leasing city conduit haven't born fruit. 4. I asked about Comcast use of city conduit, specifically at the Pole Line and Dave Pelz overcrossings, and whether the city should be collecting rent on those. Mike said his understanding is that Comcast elected not to use the city's conduit and decided to bore under instead, but he wasn't sure. He said there's also conduit under the freeway and railroad at the east end of the Nishi property (parallel with the bike undercrossing), and he doesn't think it's occupied. 5. I reiterated my belief that any Wave agreement should require that Wave pull innerducts, to be owned by the city, into any city conduit that they use. 6. He volunteered (note to Matt: I didn't bring it up) that the decision not to lay conduit in L Street was due to the price tag: $250k. It sounded like a lot to me, but I didn't have any numbers to challenge the figure. 7. Mike said that consideration of a contract with Lori Raineri would have to be in response to a formal recommendation from BATF, or possibly as an offer of assistance initiated by Lori herself. Staff isn't going to initiate such a contract on its own, it can only respond if something lands in their lap. They would have to make a finding of city benefit, but that shouldn't be hard. Mike said he was unfamiliar with Lori's background. Thanks All more soon From rob at omsoft.com Fri Apr 19 14:57:54 2019 From: rob at omsoft.com (Robert Nickerson) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:57:54 -0700 Subject: [Davisgig] Fwd: City of Davis, CA: Broadband Advisory Task Force April 24, 2019 6:30 pm In-Reply-To: <20190419213026.9F136815A6@mail6-71-ussnn1.prod.dc.dynback.net> References: <20190419213026.9F136815A6@mail6-71-ussnn1.prod.dc.dynback.net> Message-ID: <7db1a6c9-48f2-3505-a67f-4616be96212e@omsoft.com> Hi Everyone Should be an interesting meeting, possibly the final one.? BATF members will discuss and make their recommendation to go ahead and pursue municipal fiber or not. The BATF might continue after this, some other body or the effort might end. Again, the next 6 weeks are going to be critical as to if this goes forward in any way, please stay engaged. If you want to give public comment at the BATF meeting, this would certainly, be a good one to either provide in person or written comment. Please send comments to: Task Force Chair: Chris Clements (clements at ucdavis.edu), Staff Liason: Sarah Worley (sworley at cityofdavis.org) Please also send to help at dcn.org Attached is a document that was developed in support of Yes to Municipal Fiber and the high level goals and benefits the project could provide. Feel free to? reference this for Talking Points with community members. If anything has been left out or you want to comment on the google doc version of this statement, hit me up and I will send you a link to comment at. I'd like to turn it into a piece for the enterprise next week. Thanks RAN -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: City of Davis, CA: Broadband Advisory Task Force Date: 19 Apr 2019 16:30:26 -0500 From: City of Davis eNotification Reply-To: webmaster at cityofdavis.org To: omrob at dcn.org Broadband Advisory Task Force * Date: April 24, 2019 6:30 pm * Location: Community Chambers Conference Room 23 Russell Boulevard Davis, California 95616 Meeting of the Broadband Advisory Task Force . View the meeting agenda . Having trouble viewing this email? View on the website instead . Change your eNotification preference . Unsubscribe from all City of Davis, CA eNotifications . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Ring Design Principles.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 113519 bytes Desc: not available URL: